An audio book in 3 parts.
Ayush (responsible for publishing literary books) and Luke (an economics lecturer) are a gay couple who've been together 20 years. They have Thai twins aged 8. Arguments about who does what at home become arguments about the significance of their professions. They analyse using the skills of their professions. Ayush feels he's the token diversity person at work. He gets an author's book of short stories accepted, but the author Emen Ohpee refuses to reveal anything about themselves. The book flops. Ayush shows the children a video of animals being slaughtered, hoping to make the children vegetarian. Luke eats meat. Ayush is obsessive about being green. Luke thinks that market forces should be made to work. Ayush tries to teach the twins about similies. He discusses with the children about how they can have 2 dads - do children at school comment on this? Without telling Luke, Ayush has taken £200k from the twins' education fund and giving it to charity. Luke is furious at first, then quickly forgives - he can soon recover the money by doing consultancy work. He wonders why Ayush is worked up by so many little things. Perhaps, he says to Ayush, there's one big thing that's behind it all - their relationship.
Emily, an academic, gets an Uber from a party. The driver is careless. He seems to knock over a child plus a dog. Next day the driver, Saleem, starts talking to her on the street. In bad English he says that he was driving, uninsured, to replace his brother who was badly ill. She wonders whether she had false memories of the ride. Then reports appear. She asks her friend Rohan (who teaches creative writing) whether she should report the hit-and-run to the police. She asks a colleague about Uber's business model. She has meetings with Saleem. He's a refugee from Eritrea by way of Sudan, Libya, Italy, etc. She accepts an invitation to visit his brother while he's having dialysis in hospital. She donates a kidney to Saleem's brother. She decides to do some creative writing. She shows Rohan her work. He's initially angry/jealous that she's so involved with this man - is she sleeping with him? They discuss the story's technicalities, whether it's fact or fiction [A story like this one is briefly mentioned in the first section - it's in the short story collection]
A family in a village 20 miles from the nearest road await visitors. They are given a cow by a charity. The husband is away for weeks at a time. The mother works as a maid 2 hours away. They don't eat cows, though people beyond the nearby border do. They have to find food for it. Neighbours are jealous and suspicious. The mother, Sabita, makes her 2 young children give up school (which wasn't much anyway - we're told about it) to look after the cow. The charity people from town come to check how things are progressing. The mother beats the children because they can't look after the cow (which eats a neighbour's banana tree). We briefly get the cow's PoV. The people from town give her supplies, information, and a mobile phone (so they can forewarn her of visits). Sabita has no electricity. She can't even afford a bucket. She wants money. They get the cow pregnant. Sabita's 8 year-old daughter takes over the housemaid role, becoming a live-in maid. They try to find customers for the milk, working out what to do with the surplus. The husband returns, taking the cow away to sell but he's killed and the cow stolen. [A story like this one is briefly mentioned in the first section - an episode in a book about third world economics]
There are longuers in every piece, points hammered home regarding tokenism, acting local and thinking global, economics vs emotion. The first story springs the surprise of the £200k donation, the second has the bigger shock of the kidney donation. The third begins with the surprise of the cow gift, then the phone. The final story's plot has few surprises - it's all downhill, with details. I don't think it justifies its length, but I've the same doubt about all the parts.
Other reviews
- Tanjil Rashid
- Abhrajyoti Chakraborty (Choice is undone by its third section ... For the first time in the novel, nuance is eschewed for a preachy, threadbare morality. When read after the two stories set in London, Sabita’s saga of unmitigated woe leaves you with a distressing question. Does Mukherjee really think the poor, and those living in the global south, have no inner lives to speak of?)
- Tabish Khair (While “choice” connects all three parts—they are numbered, not titled—of the book, there is nothing else in common between them, except the stony backdrop of “economics” and some slight echoes, the latter especially between I and II. Despite this, I incline towards the “novel” designation as the three parts are held together by a fierce act of concentration on the matter of choice.)
- Sanjay Sipahimalani (Do the three strings of Choice vibrate when placed next to each other, creating something more than the sum of their parts? Up to a point, certainly. ... However, the prose sometimes becomes overly didactic, especially in the first two sections. ... It ought to be pointed out that Mukherjee does try to pre-empt such criticism.)