An audio book.
The pope has died. Lomeli (it's his close 3rd person PoV) is organising the vote. Tremblay, a Canadian, is one of the favourites, but Lomeli is told that the pope was about to sack him for misconduct. Bellini, an intellectual, is the liberals' favourite, and Lomeli's. Adeyemi is 10 years younger than the others, Nigerian and black - a reactionary. Factions develop. Female ordination? Proportional representation (will the dead pope be the last Italian one)? There are protesters outside. Benites arrives late - born in the Philipines with experience in Iraq and Istanbul, but little is known about him - he wasn't even in the list of cardinals. The pope had secretly included him. Lomeli gives a speech, trying to remain neutral, saying that variety within the church provides robustness against change. Voting begins - mobiles are banned and windows covered. Over a quarter of the cardinals get at least one vote in their favour. Tedesco is top. Lomeli supports Bellini. After the 2nd round, Adeyemi leads. But a Nigerian waitress seems angry with him. Lomeli finds out that 30 years before, when she was under-age and Adeyemi was 30, he made her pregnant. Lomeli finds out that Tremblay had arranged for her to be there. Lomeli challeges him. He says he summoned her because the pope asked him to.
Lomeli sneaks into the pope's room and finds hidden evidence that Tremblay (who has 500k euros in the bank) has been giving bribes in cash to several cardinals. He asks Bellini what to do. Bellini says that he should destroy the evidence. Instead he distributes the evidence to all. In the 7th vote, Lomeli (to his horror) is leading. Bombs go off nearby - the church is under threat. Benites wins the vote. Lomeli finds out that he's a woman with such a large clitoris that he was brought up as a boy. Benites says that the Pope knew this.
An easy read - a good audio book choice. Like others, I found it unexpectedly gripping. I was interested in the factual background and liked the way that individual morality is contrasted with the future of the institution - without doubt there is no faith; being pope may be a personal sacrifice for the sake of the church.
Other reviews
- Ian Sansom (Conclave doggedly sets out to provide readers with the fundamental satisfactions of story: of sequence, configuration and organisation.)
- shereadsnovels (it was the ending which struck the only wrong note for me. I had been able to sense that some sort of twist was coming up, and when it did, I felt slightly cheated. It was something that had actually passed through my mind earlier in the novel, only to be dismissed because I had also thought of several other, more convincing ways in which the story could end)
- dearauthor (I am still in shock trying to figure out what happened to me when I was reading this story, because I found it *gripping*. I could not put it down even despite the fact that any more or less experienced reader would know who will become a Pope the moment this character appears in the story.)
- John Boyne (it's a shame that Conclave, while an entertaining read, proves far less insightful than it might have been. ... Perhaps it's because their villainy is so rather mundane that Conclave fails to engage. It's not unreasonable to assume that many cardinals would like to become pope, but as each one slips from grace, the whole thing starts to become a little daft. ... Unconcerned with religious debate or philosophical argument, Conclave quickly descends into high camp. ... for all its faults, there’s no denying that the novel is a page-turner. The action moves at a breakneck pace and, with each passing ballot, the reader is keen to discover who’s up and who’s down. The twists keep coming, some visible from a mile away, some genuine surprises, but it’s the final one, saved for the closing pages, that stretches credibility to breaking point.)