An audio book.
Hope's watching Rosie (male). She's not told anyone about that summer. Somebody's murdered someone they loved.
2016. Hope's 23, a Londoner. She wants to write. Her mother thinks it a good idea that she takes a job away from distractions, in Somerset - a live-in secretary for novelist Ambrose Glencourt (Rosie). His wife Delia (about 40) is pretty. Her hobby is pottery. They live in Shadowlands, a big house with a pool. Tom, 25, lives there too. Delia had met him when he was 15 in the drug rehab clinic where she had worked.
She hasn't read his books. She wants to be a writer. He says she should be "a burglar of life". She starts reading "Unforgiven" and is impressed. He's writing "The Ruined Girl". Rosie has lovers. Delia puts up with this. She's unhappy about his children though (the youngest is 3). The previous secretary, Sarah, had to leave suddenly - had he been having an affair with her too? He French-kisses Hope, who likes him. She starts sleeping with Tom until he confesses his love for Delia. He fights Rosie. Delia and Hope think he'll kill him. So Hope threatens him with a gun and accidentally kills him. Rosie and Hope agree to keep it all secret. Hope goes home, retreating from society.
In 2026 she sees Rosie on TV talking about his sequel to his 2018 book (which became a film). She belatedly reads "The Ruined Girl". It's her story. The character's called Teresa. She's impressed by how accurate his description of her, post-incident, is. She goes to the police. Nate (female, her PoV) interviews her, reads her journal, then phones the Glencourts. They dismiss Hope as a fantasist. Nate's home life is strained - her wife finds childcare hard work. Hope has been a secretary at one of their children's school for 8 years. Charlie is coming to her office - perhaps because his father is hitting him. She goes to a book-signing session of Rosie. He later calls Nate, hinting at injunctions and admitting that the novel is more based on truth than he first said. Nate reads "The Ruined Girl" and visits the Glencourts. She decides that there's not enough evidence. The Glencourts had reported Tom's disappearance and somebody who could have been him was on the railway station's CCTV - evidence that the Glencourts owned, but the police didn't. The Glencourts know high-ranking police.
Hope is sacked (or suspended?) - she's been drinking and self-harming. Nate's marriage is in trouble. Her parents have rejected her and she's friendless. She's trying to reduce her workload and has closed the Glencourt case. Then Tom's mother phones. Again Nate has trouble reconsiling Hope's journal, the novel, and the original police investigation. Hope sneaks into Shadowlands. She finds in a folder of research for Unforgiven's follow-up some photos of her, some quite recent. She realises that for Rosie, art matters more than people. For her, the morality of his authorship matters more than real-world crimes. She tells Nate of this new evidence. Nate contacts Sarah and the secretary before her, finding out the Rosie was subtly predatory. Hope asks Nate about Charlie's father then goes to Shadowlands where she sees that Tom's alive. He tells her that the bullets and blood were fake - Rosie had staged it (and her relationship with Tom) to get material for his novel. Tom had fallen for Hope though he was only playing a role. Hope tells Nate all this. Hope threatens Charlie's dad using a gun she stole from Shadowlands, ordering him to leave his family. He reports the incident to the police. Nate interviews Hope.
4 years later, Delia attends the booksigning for Hope's successful debut novel, whose central theme seems to be Rosie's mistreatment of Delia. Delia gives Hope a tape. On it is a recording of Rosie asking Tom how young love felt. Tom described Hope's effect on him. She plans to buy Shadowlands, become friends with Tom again, and help underpriviledged children.
I don't think the prologue's needed. The second part's more interesting than the first. We're told too many times that each narrator has their own versions, and that society suppresses some narratives. Whose narrative wins out and why? I don't think this book explores the issues very well. Could Tom really have disappeared that long? Hope's final success (as a person and an author) sounds unlikely though I can see why it's thematically appropriate - she has taken over the narrative of the characters because the justice system didn't. Nate's story is all but abandoned. "A sticky silence ballooned around them" doesn't sound right.
Other reviews
- Shannon Carriger (Araminta Hall has likely written very good books in the past, but Unreliable Narrator isn’t strong. ... part one then moves through four months of diary entries, which I found implausible as they showed the protagonist to be simultaneously naive and world-weary, innocent and sexually charged. ... Part two, in the present, sees the protagonist admit to a crime while several unnecessary subplots unfold. They didn’t add to the central narrative and made me question why the author included them.)
- booksbyyourbedside (I thought this would drag, but it did flow quite well, at least to begin with, and it did start to dwindle as it went on. It is the epitome of a psychological thriller and whilst it wasn’t perfect, there were some good bits. But it is too long, too detail heavy, with questionable characters, but parts of it were engaging and intriguing and it did pass quicker than I thought.)
- goodreads (3.6/5 rating)