First impressions - that he's a poet's poet who seems to know what he's doing though I often don't know what that is. "Thin" is a narrow poem (a mirror poem - the last and first lines the same, etc), but when it begins "Forgive me, Sir,/ I'm writing thin" are we meant to agree with him that he's running on empty? When "The Last Poem" (on the final, unnumbered page) says "The last poem was not luminous / It did not vibrate. It evoked// not very much at all." should we be charmed by his false modesty or his honesty?
"The Mithras Machine" is 8 sections of unpunctuated, unparagraphed prose, where full stops have became gaps. It's dense right from the start - "This lintel is a dark landing of cargo from that bellied perfection of our fathers around my stab of torchlight something gathers like oil hungering up the drill I grow then crack open as false sleep sometimes does to a chemical light on northumberland moors". Contrast that with "Bread" - 24 lines, 8 of them "My mother's bread", or with
|
Let us buy bread and wine. Let your bread be my bread. Let your wine be my wine. Let us place them in a bag which is both your bag and mine. (p.6) |
or the abstraction of "Was this the sound/ of the whole unweighted mass of water,/ or its breaking,/ its unnumbered fragments?" (p.29) or of
|
And if I am still here, it is in the sense of October sunlight. I am here, then not here, then here again. If I am here, where I was taken, I am moments of light on an empty ground. (p.13) |
And yet, he can do the kind of imagery approved by workshops -
|
this is the poem that rafts me into morning, you the dark island I fetch up against. (p.8) |
However good some of the material might be, I suspect there's too little of it to make this book a winner.
